[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/7] i965: Implement EGL_ANDROID_native_fence_sync

[Chris Wilson]

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:35:34AM -0800, Chad Versace wrote:
> On Fri 27 Jan 2017, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 07:18:24PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > On 17-01-23 15:32:32, Chad Versace wrote:
> > > > On Fri 20 Jan 2017, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> > > > > I have tested this series with the branches that you mentioned, and with
> > > > > piglit with the patches from my own branch:
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://github.com/rantogno/piglit/tree/review/fences-v02
> > > > > 
> > > > > Everything seems to work fine. You can add:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Tested-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli at intel.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > I also have gone through these patches several times while they were
> > > > > under development, and they look good to me. So if you disregard my
> > > > > shallow knowledge of Mesa, you could add:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli at intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks. I've added the rb's and tb's locally.
> > > 
> > > So IMO, Rafael is a great person to review this. He's underselling his knowledge
> > > to his detriment. Is there something preventing pushing these patches?
> > 
> > I believe there's nothing technically blocking it from landing, but Chad
> > wanted to push them only after the kernel patches had landed.
> 
> Right. I'm waiting for the kernel devs to agree to Chris's execbuffer
> fence fd patch.
> 
> > Hi Chris, do we have everything we need now to have the kernel side to
> > land?
> 
> Mesa is still blocked on this i915 patch: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2017-January/117998.html

Done. Pushed to explicit fencing to kernel and libdrm.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre