[PATCH] iface-modem-3gpp: add SubscriptionState property

[Dan Williams]

On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 16:44 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> On 28/09/13 07:13, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> This patch adds a new property, SubscriptionState, to
> >> > org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.Modem.Modem3gpp.  The subscription state
> >> > is used to indicate whether an account has been provisioned, and if so,
> >> > whether the account has any data left.
> >> > 
> >> > There will be two subsequent patches that will make use of this new property.
> > There seems to be some conceptual overlap with the 3gpp2
> > MMModemCdmaActivationState, perhaps this property could instead be a
> > generic Modem interface property instead, and the 3GPP2 stuff could
> > update both ActivateState and the generic SubscriptionStatus property
> > from the same data?
> > 
> > Or are there potentially more 3GPP states for the subscription than what
> > you've defined here?
> 
> Do you really think it's a good idea to merge these? If the 3GPP ones
> are 'unprovisioned', 'provisioned-with-data' and
> 'provisioned-data-exhausted'; they really have not much to do with the
> 3GPP2 ones. Also, I understand that not-yet-activated accounts in 3GPP2
> may be normal (e.g. when you buy a new device); but I don't think that's
> the case in 3GPP.

You may certainly be correct here; I'm just trying to generate some
discussion around generic activation/provisioning states.  I see quite a
few parallels in the *behavior* between 3GPP provisioning and 3GPP2
activation and was wondering if there was a more generic means we could
use to represent this, such that clients don't have to care whether it's
3GPP2 or 3GPP.

Some clients wouldn't necessarily know how to start
provisioning/activating, but they would certainly want to know if the
device was provisioned or not, so they could indicate to the user that
they have to go to some website to provision the device instead of the
user expecting they can use it immediately after inserting the SIM.
Which might be useful as a generic property, what do you think?

Dan