[ooo-build] REMINDER: Release 3.2-beta3 from ooo-build master
Charles Marcus
CMarcus at Media-Brokers.com
Fri Dec 4 04:40:48 PST 2009
On 12/3/2009, Kohei Yoshida (kyoshida at novell.com) wrote:
> Right now Novell provides a bunch of paid developers to
> work on ooo-build full-time (myself included), but the intention is to
> keep it truly community-driven, and stay true to the true open-source
> development philosophy.
>
> But we are not hostile to the upstream developers. We do coordinate
> with them at many levels.
>
> Hope this answers your question.
Thank you very much for taking the time to respond to my questions
Kohei. One last follow-up if you don't mind, then I'll go silent for a
while... ;)
Above you say that Novell provides a bunch of devs... I thouhght that
go-oo was the Novell 'alternate' branch... ? So Novell is supporting two
completely different alternative builds of ooo? Or, maybe its as simple
as go-oo releases are simply compiled builds of ooo-build branch?
Sorry for being dense, but I'd like to understand the relationship.
Incidentally - one of the reasons for my questions is, I got bit pretty
bad by a bug in one of the go-oo releases (not a beta or rc) - when we
tried to use our library of OOo based templates, they behaved in odd
ways - borders, tables - just lots of problems, mostly with writer
templates if I'm not mistaken, but it was well over a year ago.
--
Best regards,
Charles
More information about the ooo-build
mailing list