[Openchrome-devel] Coordinating some changes

[Thomas Hellström]

Robert Bridge wrote:
> Thomas Hellstr?m wrote:
>   
>> I'm also a bit curious about what's behind the VIANamedFunction formatting?
>> Both the openChrome coding style (as documented on the wiki) and the 
>> Xorg coding style calls for
>> viaFunctionName?
>>     
>
> As I understand it, inconsistency has crept in to the naming patterns, 
> and when it was suggested to settle on a single one and change the tree 
> to match it, Bruce Chang of Via specifically indicated a preference for 
> VIANameingPattern.
>
> As there were no dissenting voices (on the list) at the time, I thing 
> Jon decided to go with that.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
>   
OK.
I think most of the inconsistencies crept in after it was decided to go 
for the Xorg coding style for new code.

Anyway, I don't have a strong preference for which naming should be 
used, although I think that if Xorg and openChrome has a documented 
coding style we should keep to it.

However, new development and coding style fixups should IMHO be kept 
strictly separate.

/Thomas

> _______________________________________________
> Openchrome-devel mailing list
> Openchrome-devel at openchrome.org
> http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-devel
>