[Openchrome-users] Max Texture Size

[Thomas Hellström]

Boris Du?ek wrote:

>Well,
>
>according to my up-to-date Mesa cvs sources, it did not get commited.
>
>Btw. do you think it could influence success with xgl? Some radeon people 
>reported that they got the "No screens found" error until they added to 
>their /etc/drirc <option name="allow_large_textures" value="1" />, but it did 
>not help me without the patch.
>
>Regards,
>Boris Dusek
>  
>
Hi!

This patch never got committed because it breaks OpenGL conformance, 
which requires all mipmap levels to be present all the way down to 1x1. 
IIRC the unichromes only have 9  hw mipmap levels.

In many cases the patch would be very useful, however, and at the time, 
the people involved agreed that the best thing to do would be to have an 
option in driconf to either enable or disable the default behaviour 
depending on what was choosen to be the default behaviour. Nobody cared 
to write the configuration code, though.

/Thomas

>On Monday 24 April 2006 15:40, Ivor Hewitt wrote:
>  
>
>>Anyone know if the texture size fix in:-
>>
>>https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3130
>>
>>ever got committed to dri? and if not why not?
>>    
>>
>_______________________________________________
>openchrome-users mailing list
>openchrome-users at openchrome.org
>http://wiki.openchrome.org/mailman/listinfo/openchrome-users
>Main page:
>http://www.openchrome.org
>Wiki:
>http://wiki.openchrome.org
>User Forum:
>http://wiki.openchrome.org/tikiwiki/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=1
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wiki.openchrome.org/pipermail/openchrome-users/attachments/20060424/b058a5d7/attachment.html