[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2 6/9] device-port: Add "linked" flag

David Henningsson david.henningsson at canonical.com
Fri Mar 15 07:43:22 PDT 2013

On 03/14/2013 04:17 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 15:02 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
>> On 02/20/2013 07:24 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>>> The flag will be used in the upcoming pa_device_port_update_proplist()
>>> function.
>> If the flag's function is to protect against an initial change
>> notification, does it really work? init_eld_ctls is called after
>> pa_card_new in module-alsa-card.c.
> Good observation. It looks like we need to separate pa_card_put() from
> pa_card_new(), because init_eld_ctls() needs the card object, so moving
> it before the pa_card_new() call.
>> If we need a flag at all, I'd prefer to keep it in the card struct
>> rather than the port. That seems cleaner to me.
> OK, I don't necessarily agree with this, but there aren't any big issues
> with reusing the card state as the port state.

Since it's the card we actually send a notification for, following the 
card's state seems more logical to me.

David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.

More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list