[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2 6/9] device-port: Add "linked" flag
tanuk at iki.fi
Fri Mar 15 09:04:54 PDT 2013
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 15:43 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 04:17 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 15:02 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> >> On 02/20/2013 07:24 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >>> The flag will be used in the upcoming pa_device_port_update_proplist()
> >>> function.
> >> If the flag's function is to protect against an initial change
> >> notification, does it really work? init_eld_ctls is called after
> >> pa_card_new in module-alsa-card.c.
> > Good observation. It looks like we need to separate pa_card_put() from
> > pa_card_new(), because init_eld_ctls() needs the card object, so moving
> > it before the pa_card_new() call.
> >> If we need a flag at all, I'd prefer to keep it in the card struct
> >> rather than the port. That seems cleaner to me.
> > OK, I don't necessarily agree with this, but there aren't any big issues
> > with reusing the card state as the port state.
> Since it's the card we actually send a notification for, following the
> card's state seems more logical to me.
That's a native protocol specific quirk. The D-Bus protocol would send
the notification for the port, if it was implemented (the D-Bus protocol
doesn't currently send any notification). I would prefer to do the same
in the native protocol too, if changing that wouldn't have compatibility
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss