[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v3 4/4] Revert "card: Support adding ports dynamically"
David Henningsson
david.henningsson at canonical.com
Mon Mar 25 18:33:57 PDT 2013
On 03/25/2013 07:13 PM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> Hi Tanu,
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Tanu Kaskinen <tanuk at iki.fi> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 11:32 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote:
>>> From: Mikel Astiz <mikel.astiz at bmw-carit.de>
>>>
>>> This reverts commit a9c3f2fb0fc1a1ee0072aac6425ad7311a2a5888.
>>>
>>> It has been recently agreed that ports should somehow have some physical
>>> meaning, leading to the port merge in module-bluetooth-device.
>>>
>>> With this assumption in mind, it is very unlikely that a card would
>>> add or remove ports dynamically. Therefore, the core can be simplified
>>> by removing the support for this.
>>>
>>> The revert affects the code added to module-card-restore in commit
>>> a1a0ad1af209e58c136ac1c884aa5d14672a7144, which can now be partially
>>> removed.
>>>
>>> Conflicts:
>>> src/pulsecore/card.c
>>> src/pulsecore/core.h
>>> ---
>>> src/modules/module-card-restore.c | 43 ---------------------------------------
>>> src/pulsecore/card.c | 19 -----------------
>>> src/pulsecore/card.h | 1 -
>>> src/pulsecore/core.h | 1 -
>>> 4 files changed, 64 deletions(-)
>>
>> It was suggested that this patch wouldn't be applied yet. When would be
>> the right time?
>
> I don't see Bluetooth making use of this feature, so unless the alsa
> modules can benefit from it, which seems unlikely, I'd rather remove
> it before the release freeze.
Agreed.
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list