[pulseaudio-discuss] Pavucontrol on Flathub

Arun Raghavan arun at arunraghavan.net
Tue Jul 2 04:59:39 UTC 2019

On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, at 10:28 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> Once we've set up the procedures for maintaining the flatpak ourselves,
> is there any reason to have a separate repository for it? Shouldn't the
> flatpak stuff go to the main pavucontrol repo? Not that I have anything
> against having push rights to the current github repo for now. (By "the
> procedures" I mean documenting how to update the flatpak build files
> and how to test them, and following that documentation when doing
> releases.)

I think it might be worth having it on flathub to be able to use all the existing CI infrastructure over there.


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list