[Spice-devel] [PATCH v4 06/12] Rephrase section on short functions for readability

[Christophe de Dinechin]

> On 16 Feb 2018, at 10:05, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:06:19PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> From: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin at redhat.com>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> docs/spice_style.txt | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/docs/spice_style.txt b/docs/spice_style.txt
>> index 996c5cd9..9e6536e4 100644
>> --- a/docs/spice_style.txt
>> +++ b/docs/spice_style.txt
>> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ If multiple related constants are to be defined, consider the use of enumeration
>> Short functions
>> ---------------
>> 
>> -Try to split code to short functions, each having simple functionality, in order to improve code readability and re-usability. Prefix with inline short functions or functions that were splitted for readability reason.
>> +Try to split code to short functions, each having simple functionality, in order to improve code readability and re-usability. Prefix with `inline` functions that were splitted for readability reason or that are very short.
> 
> I'd just drop the second sentence. The compiler usually knows better.

Agreed, done.

> 
> Christophe