Separating X clients under Wayland
Pekka Paalanen
ppaalanen at gmail.com
Mon Oct 12 00:15:20 PDT 2015
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:59:49 +0200
Ole Kliemann <ole-wayland-devel-2015 at mail.plastictree.net> wrote:
> Sometime ago a question was posted on this list whether X clients
> under XWayland are separated from each other like Wayland clients
> are. It was concluded that they are not. [1]
>
> However, it was suggested that of course one could start a
> separate X server for each client to achieve separation. [2]
>
> My question now is: Can XWayland be configured or modified to
> behave this way?
Hi,
I don't think you will need anything extra in Xwayland to support this.
What you do need though is the Wayland compositor to support it. The
compositor needs to know to launch more Xwayland servers, and the XWM
(proxying X11 window manager) embedded in the compositor needs to be
able to deal with it too.
So, this question is specific to the compositor you choose to run. I
suspect no current compositor implementation supports this by
configuration alone, you'd need to actually implement the feature first.
Thanks,
pq
> I was trying Xephyr to separate X clients under X once; I believe
> Red Hat has a sandboxing utility that works similar. But
> something like this is usually tedious to setup and clunky to
> use.
>
> Thus it would be very useful if Wayland simply would handle
> starting separate X servers for each client.
>
>
>
> [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2014-January/012705.html
> [2] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2014-January/012777.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20151012/9ed803c4/attachment.sig>
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list