wayland-protocols scope and governance

[Johan Helsing]

Hi,

Thanks for asking, a membership for Qt would would be much appreciated! I'm probably the best point of contact.

I've read through the document (v5) and it makes sense to me.

Acked-by: Johan Helsing <johan.helsing at qt.io>

Qt has interest in the project both as a compositor toolkit and as a client toolkit. I'm really excited for a clear submission process, and I hope it will lead to increased co-operation and compatibility across toolkits and compositors.

Br,
Johan Helsing
________________________________
From: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 16:35
To: Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr>
Cc: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com>; Roman Gilg <subdiff at gmail.com>; wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org <wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>; Drew DeVault <sir at cmpwn.com>; Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org>; Jonas Ådahl <jadahl at gmail.com>; Derek Foreman <derekf at osg.samsung.com>; Carlos Garnacho <carlosg at gnome.org>; Johan Helsing <johan.helsing at qt.io>
Subject: Re: wayland-protocols scope and governance

Hi,

I've been following along on this thread, and I really appreciate that you've reached out to me.

The current document seems reasonable to me. It will be a positive for the ecosystem to have a clearly-defined method of proposing and stabilizing new protocols for adoption.

I'm not quite as active in the Wayland space as I have been historically, but EFL/Enlightenment does have interest in joining this community and I'm still probably the best point of contact at this time.


Regards,
Mike

PS. The email address you used for Derek is no longer active (it hasn't been for years) and you should likely check with him on IRC for a more up-to-date address and/or interest.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:17 AM Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr<mailto:contact at emersion.fr>> wrote:
[Cc'ing more people]

> > Points of contact I had in mind:
> >
> > - KWin: Roman Gilg <subdiff at gmail.com<mailto:subdiff at gmail.com>>
> > - Mutter: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl at gmail.com<mailto:jadahl at gmail.com>>
> > - Weston: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen at collabora.com<mailto:pekka.paalanen at collabora.com>>,
> >   Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org<mailto:daniel at fooishbar.org>>
> > - wlroots: Drew DeVault <sir at cmpwn.com<mailto:sir at cmpwn.com>>, Simon Ser <contact at emersion.fr<mailto:contact at emersion.fr>>
> >
> > I think it would make sense to include this initial list in a MEMBERS
> > file in the upcoming wayland-protocols patch series that adds this
> > governance document.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Sounds good to me!
>
> Prodding toolkit projects for people would be good, and also
> Enlightenment.

Hi all,

We've been discussing for a while about wayland-protocols governance. You can
find the latest proposal at [1].

We're discussing about the initial list of members. Would Enlightenment, Qt and
GTK be interested in being initial members as well?

Feedback is welcome. Thanks,

[1]: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2019-October/040919.html

Simon

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20191018/e7e8f698/attachment-0001.html>