CVS move

Havoc Pennington hp at
Tue Sep 23 05:09:14 EEST 2003

On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 19:09, Keith Packard wrote:
> went even further in this direction; they split out every 
> module into a separate group, but ended up needing to hack the kernel so 
> that individual users could be in more than 32 groups.  I'm hoping adding 
> this extra level of indirection will let us survive with standard kernels 
> and tools while still providing a level of intra-project self-management.

Ah yes, I was wondering about that 32-group limit...

> For specs associated with specific software packages, I'd like to see those
> kept with the code.  ICCCM extensions could live in the xlibs project where
> any supporting code would eventually live.  For specs which have no home, 
> I guess a separate project to hold them makes as much sense as anything.

Makes sense.


More information about the xdg mailing list