Commit notifications for specs
Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgquiles at elpauer.org
Wed Apr 30 08:18:48 PDT 2008
Quoting Vincent Untz <vuntz at gnome.org>:
> I totally agree that we need to put more than just versions of the
> specs, but also the adoption status, a kind of stability status (is it
> still in development, with potential incompatible changes in the
> future?), draft vs released status, etc.
Regarding the adoption status, stability status, etc, I'd like to urge
both KDE eV and Gnome Foundation to "enforce" FreeDesktop.org's
specifications, as I discussed with Vincent and others at Guademy last
weekend.
Long story short, it would be like this: if there is a fd.o spec for
what you are doing and you are not using it, your app/library won't
enter the official KDE/Gnome/whatever repository *unless* you provide
good reasons for not implementing the fd.o spec (that "unless" is
there in case the spec is disconnected from reality or plain junk).
More at:
http://www.elpauer.org/index.php?p=249
> Basically, metadata in the repository appears in a simple file and is
> translated to something easily understandable on the website.
>
> I quite like the idea of having a FAQ, btw.
>
> For people interested, I put my GUADEMY slides at:
> http://www.vuntz.net/presentations/guademy-2008/guademy-2008_fd.o-specs.pdf
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
More information about the xdg
mailing list