ATI open source vs Catalyst phoronix benchmarks

[Andres Cimmarusti]

That would be fine for a clean test between Radeon and Catalyst, but the first link has benchmarks of old releases of radeon that are way better than the current stable one....There are many regressions that haven't been addressed.

--- On Thu, 7/15/10, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ATI open source vs Catalyst phoronix benchmarks
To: "Andres Cimmarusti" <andrescimmarusti at yahoo.com>
Cc: xorg-driver-ati at lists.x.org
Date: Thursday, July 15, 2010, 1:29 PM

Michael should really be running xf86-video-ati and libdrm from git and 
latest kernel-rcX, otherwise the perfomance will continue to suck in his
 articles.



There are performance improvements and there will be more as time goes by, but 
the majority of them is and will be disabled with old kernels and DDX drivers.

-Marek

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Andres Cimmarusti <andrescimmarusti at yahoo.com> wrote:


>
> ATI R300 Mesa, Gallium3D vs Catalyst
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ati_r300_current&num=1


>
> ATI R500 Mesa vs Catalyst
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_lts_graphics&num=1


>
> The first benchmark depressed me, as I have one of these cards...
>
> Andres
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-driver-ati mailing list
> xorg-driver-ati at lists.x.org


> http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
>




      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-driver-ati/attachments/20100715/aeaab0ac/attachment.html>