GLX indirect rendering broken

[Alan Hourihane]

On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 10:27 -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
> > 
> > I was going to look into bug 4087 so I updated my CVS tree and did a 
> > fresh build.  Indirect rendering seems to be quite broken.  Almost 
> > everything I try running produces a protocol error:
> > 
> > $ ./gears
> > X Error of failed request:  BadLength (poly request too large or 
> > internal Xlib length error)
> >   Major opcode of failed request:  143 (GLX)
> >   Minor opcode of failed request:  1 (X_GLXRender)
> >   Serial number of failed request:  37
> >   Current serial number in output stream:  38
> > 
> > 
> > If I set a breakpoint in _XError() I get this stack trace:
> > 
> > (gdb) where
> > #0  0x009ead66 in _XError () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
> > #1  0x009eb557 in _XReply () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
> > #2  0xf6ef7e35 in __glXReadReply (dpy=0x8212050, size=0, dest=0x0,
> >     reply_is_always_array=0 '\0') at indirect.c:70
> > #3  0xf6ef8a9e in __indirect_glGenLists (range=1) at indirect.c:400
> > #4  0xf6f20427 in glGenLists (range=1) at glapitemp.h:100
> > #5  0x0804a948 in init (argc=1, argv=0xfef6d0e4) at gears.c:318
> > #6  0x0804ac9a in main (argc=1, argv=0xfef6d0e4) at gears.c:369
> > 
> > Other programs generate the BadLength error from different GL calls.
> > 
> > Is anyone else seeing this?
> > 
> > I'm pretty sure it's a server-side problem and not in libGL.
> 
> Can anyone confirm this?  Anyone?

I'm doing a fresh checkout and then a build. I'll see if I can
reproduce.

Alan.