[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 5/5] i965 gen7: add support for layered color renderbuffers

Paul Berry stereotype441 at gmail.com
Mon May 20 14:08:51 PDT 2013


On 17 May 2013 21:44, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Jordan Justen
> <jordan.l.justen at intel.com> wrote:
> > Rather than pointing the surface_state directly at a single
> > sub-image of the texture for rendering, we now point the
> > surface_state at the top level of the texture, and configure
> > the surface_state as needed based on this.
> >
> > We now also need to stop setting the FORCE_ZERO_RTAINDEX bit
> > in the clip date so render target array values other than zero
> > will be used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h           |    2 +
> >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c       |    3 +-
> >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c |   63
> +++++++++++++++------
> >  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> > index fedd78c..d61151f 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> > @@ -539,6 +539,8 @@
> >  #define GEN7_SURFACE_MULTISAMPLECOUNT_8         (3 << 3)
> >  #define GEN7_SURFACE_MSFMT_MSS                  (0 << 6)
> >  #define GEN7_SURFACE_MSFMT_DEPTH_STENCIL        (1 << 6)
> > +#define GEN7_SURFACE_MIN_ARRAY_ELEMENT_SHIFT   18
> > +#define GEN7_SURFACE_RENDER_TARGET_VIEW_EXTENT_SHIFT   7
> >
> >  /* Surface state DW5 */
> >  #define BRW_SURFACE_X_OFFSET_SHIFT             25
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c
> > index 29a5ed5..1256f32 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c
> > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_clip_state.c
> > @@ -107,8 +107,7 @@ upload_clip_state(struct brw_context *brw)
> >              GEN6_CLIP_XY_TEST |
> >               dw2);
> >     OUT_BATCH(U_FIXED(0.125, 3) << GEN6_CLIP_MIN_POINT_WIDTH_SHIFT |
> > -             U_FIXED(255.875, 3) << GEN6_CLIP_MAX_POINT_WIDTH_SHIFT |
> > -             GEN6_CLIP_FORCE_ZERO_RTAINDEX);
> > +             U_FIXED(255.875, 3) << GEN6_CLIP_MAX_POINT_WIDTH_SHIFT);
> >     ADVANCE_BATCH();
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c
> > index 6c01545..5f15eff 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c
> > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen7_wm_surface_state.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >  #include "main/mtypes.h"
> >  #include "main/blend.h"
> >  #include "main/samplerobj.h"
> > +#include "main/texformat.h"
> >  #include "program/prog_parameter.h"
> >
> >  #include "intel_mipmap_tree.h"
> > @@ -529,12 +530,13 @@ gen7_update_renderbuffer_surface(struct
> brw_context *brw,
> >     struct gl_context *ctx = &intel->ctx;
> >     struct intel_renderbuffer *irb = intel_renderbuffer(rb);
> >     struct intel_region *region = irb->mt->region;
> > -   uint32_t tile_x, tile_y;
> >     uint32_t format;
> >     /* _NEW_BUFFERS */
> >     gl_format rb_format = _mesa_get_render_format(ctx,
> intel_rb_format(irb));
> > -
> > -   assert(!layered);
> > +   uint32_t surftype;
> > +   bool is_array = false;
> > +   int depth = rb->Depth > 0 ? rb->Depth - 1 : 0;
> > +   int min_array_element = 0;
> >
> >     uint32_t *surf = brw_state_batch(brw, AUB_TRACE_SURFACE_STATE,
> >                                      8 * 4, 32,
> &brw->wm.surf_offset[unit]);
> > @@ -550,7 +552,23 @@ gen7_update_renderbuffer_surface(struct brw_context
> *brw,
> >                      __FUNCTION__, _mesa_get_format_name(rb_format));
> >     }
> >
> > -   surf[0] = BRW_SURFACE_2D << BRW_SURFACE_TYPE_SHIFT |
> > +   if (rb->TexImage) {
> > +      surftype = translate_tex_target(rb->TexImage->TexObject->Target);
> > +      is_array =
> _mesa_tex_target_is_array(rb->TexImage->TexObject->Target);
> > +      if (rb->TexImage->TexObject->Target == GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_ARRAY)
> {
> > +         assert(rb->Depth > 0);
> > +         surftype = BRW_SURFACE_2D;
> > +         depth = (6 * (depth + 1)) - 1;
> > +      } else if (rb->TexImage->TexObject->Target ==
> GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP) {
> > +         surftype = BRW_SURFACE_2D;
> > +         depth = 5;
> > +         is_array = true;
> > +      }
> > +   } else {
> > +      surftype = BRW_SURFACE_2D;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   surf[0] = surftype << BRW_SURFACE_TYPE_SHIFT |
> >               format << BRW_SURFACE_FORMAT_SHIFT |
> >               (irb->mt->array_spacing_lod0 ? GEN7_SURFACE_ARYSPC_LOD0
> >                                            : GEN7_SURFACE_ARYSPC_FULL) |
> > @@ -561,24 +579,33 @@ gen7_update_renderbuffer_surface(struct
> brw_context *brw,
> >     if (irb->mt->align_w == 8)
> >        surf[0] |= GEN7_SURFACE_HALIGN_8;
> >
> > -   /* reloc */
> > -   surf[1] = intel_renderbuffer_tile_offsets(irb, &tile_x, &tile_y) +
> > -             region->bo->offset; /* reloc */
> > +   if (is_array) {
> > +      surf[0] |= GEN7_SURFACE_IS_ARRAY;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   if (!layered) {
> > +      if (irb->mt->num_samples > 1) {
> > +         min_array_element = irb->mt_layer / irb->mt->num_samples;
> > +      } else {
> > +         min_array_element = irb->mt_layer;
> > +      }
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   surf[1] = region->bo->offset;
> >
> >     assert(brw->has_surface_tile_offset);
> > -   /* Note that the low bits of these fields are missing, so
> > -    * there's the possibility of getting in trouble.
> > -    */
> > -   assert(tile_x % 4 == 0);
> > -   assert(tile_y % 2 == 0);
> > -   surf[5] = SET_FIELD(tile_x / 4, BRW_SURFACE_X_OFFSET) |
> > -             SET_FIELD(tile_y / 2, BRW_SURFACE_Y_OFFSET);
> >
> > -   surf[2] = SET_FIELD(rb->Width - 1, GEN7_SURFACE_WIDTH) |
> > -             SET_FIELD(rb->Height - 1, GEN7_SURFACE_HEIGHT);
> > -   surf[3] = region->pitch - 1;
> > +   surf[5] = irb->mt_level;
> The PRM says that the LOD field of all render targets and the depth
> buffer must be the same.  Is this going to violate that?
>

Based on some discussions with the hardware architects, and the fact that
this patch series doesn't cause any piglit regressions, we believe that is
not actually a hard requirement.


>
> > +
> > +   surf[2] = SET_FIELD(irb->mt->logical_width0 - 1, GEN7_SURFACE_WIDTH)
> |
> > +             SET_FIELD(irb->mt->logical_height0 - 1,
> GEN7_SURFACE_HEIGHT);
> > +
> > +   surf[3] = (depth << BRW_SURFACE_DEPTH_SHIFT) |
> > +             (region->pitch - 1);
> >
> > -   surf[4] = gen7_surface_msaa_bits(irb->mt->num_samples,
> irb->mt->msaa_layout);
> > +   surf[4] = gen7_surface_msaa_bits(irb->mt->num_samples,
> irb->mt->msaa_layout) |
> > +             min_array_element << GEN7_SURFACE_MIN_ARRAY_ELEMENT_SHIFT |
> > +             depth << GEN7_SURFACE_RENDER_TARGET_VIEW_EXTENT_SHIFT;
> >
> >     if (irb->mt->msaa_layout == INTEL_MSAA_LAYOUT_CMS) {
> >        gen7_set_surface_mcs_info(brw, surf, brw->wm.surf_offset[unit],
> > --
> > 1.7.10.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-dev mailing list
> > mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
>
>
> --
> olv at LunarG.com
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20130520/173f15d0/attachment.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list